create 153d ago
tag gangbang
Tag description A sexual scene involving one girl (usually) being simultaneously fucked by three or more men. Focuses on multiple penetration, being surrounded and overwhelmed by cocks, constant sexual use, and often includes elements like cum inflation, bukkake, double/triple penetration, and the girl being passed around
note This tag doesnt exist

Post a comment

or to post a comment.

16 Comments

fuckriri1234
fuckriri1234
create tag orgy accepted create tag double date +7 more discussion here. Ammending orgy to be "6 or more" from my previous comments
fuckriri1234
fuckriri1234
[1/2] "Gang bang" is a group of three or more people having sex focused on one or two other consenting* characters. A total of four or more characters must be involved; that way it doesn't overlap with existing threesome tags "Gang rape" is the above, but with an explicit or clear demonstration of non-consent* from the "focus character(s)" "Orgy" is a group of four or more having sex without any specific central character [1] "Group" defines three or more people involved in a sexual activity; it is an umbrella term that contains the above sub-tags, as well as all threesome variants. [1] pg 77
fuckriri1234
fuckriri1234
[2/2] I would then divide "gang bang" and "gang rape" using the gender of the central character NOT the group. For example, "female gang bang" would refer to a group with a consenting female center [1]. Apply this logic to "female gang rape" (non-consenting) [2], then flip them both to get "male gang bang" [3] and "male gang rape" [4] The reason for this is because the current definition of "gang bang" excludes groups of goblins, tentacles, or any other non-human. It even excludes works that might have a group of varying genders I don't think I need to explain why that's a bad thing for the site [1] female gang bang pg 1 [2] (tw loli) female gang rape pg 9 [3] male gang bang pg 33 [4] male center gang rape pg 12
jk75
jk75
"gangbang" is just "group" tag if disregard of willingness (as the term does not implied it's a rape). if it's explicitly unwilling, then we have "gang rape" or "group" + "rape".
Octrice's Stocking
Octrice's Stocking
agree with the comment below me
Osamu09
Osamu09
guys, how has nobody realized there's a "gang rape" tag? I guess it's technically not the same. As some people already mentioned it doesn't have to be rape. But we have a rape tag, so we can just rename "gang rape" to "gangbang" and we have both
DDnhen
DDnhen
Always thought the Group tag was too vague. Too many different things fall under the category of "group" sex, orgy, threesome, foursome, gangbang, reverse gangbang, bukkake, etc. Yes, you could search group and then exclude things like ffm threesome and mmf threesome, and so on, but that's just too tedious. And it's not like gangbang is an uncommon scenario, plenty of other porn sites have it as a tag so why not here too?
onemoreaccisneeded
onemoreaccisneeded
Group is completely useless since it describes multiple scenarios that are also not related at all. It's clear we need to distinguish between 1 male and multiple females/1 female multiple males/multiple of all with a different tag for each.
Xx155681xX
Xx155681xX
I think it’s very different from a group. You need to use the word gangbang to distinguish it from what could be an orgy, with an ‘everyone vs. one’ dynamic.
frmgco2
frmgco2
In conclusion, group is a non-descriptor only useful in conjunction with tags such as harem, mmf threesome, or the proposed gangbang. Thank you for coming to my Ted talk.
frmgco2
frmgco2
3. Gangbang is not rape, the girl can be in control and fully enjoy the situation (# )
frmgco2
frmgco2
2. The group tag is extremely vague. Are we talking about a harem king? A debauched swinging orgy? A slut hopping dick to dick? Those are all very different tastes encompassed by the same tag.
frmgco2
frmgco2
1. The group tag currently has 100k entries. Even if you remove duplicates, blacklist, and filter english there's no way anyone who likes group would enjoy all the entries.
lol69XDYuri
lol69XDYuri
I think the group tag already covers enough, as others have also already pointed out.
h2016
h2016
To me, the gangbang tag is like a combination of group and rape tags. `gangbang` = `group` + `rape` I don't thinkg a tag like this is a good idea though.
Rafugapu
Rafugapu
Maybe it'll be proper as rename. Not tag adding