Back to suggestions
create edited 62d ago
tag crossdressing male
Tag description Used to describe male characters dressing in female clothing
note Might as well complete the gendered tagging for crossdressing. Related proposals/tags as well as further reasoning for this tags existence in the discussion

Edit history

  1. fuckriri1234 62d ago
    Description
    -Used to describe male-presenting characters dressing in female clothing
    +Used to describe male characters dressing in female clothing

Post a comment

or to post a comment.

3 Comments

fuckriri1234
fuckriri1234
@lord411 fair point. There generally exists more "traditionally feminine clothing" than "traditionally masculine clothing" so it logically follows that [crossdressing male] would be more popular (which it is). that doesn't mean [crossdressing female] is non-existent though that said, i'm not terribly familiar with [crossdressing] as a whole, though a quick search for [crossdressing female] returns pg12 . this is a better question for the [crossdressing female] discussion where other users might be more familiar either way, i'm mainly here to follow a) site conventions and b) what other users seem to want
lord411
lord411
Is "crossdressing female" even a thing? Women wearing pants and tshirts isn't "crossdressing", it's just normal. Then "crossdressing" would simply mean " crossdressing male"
fuckriri1234
fuckriri1234
before anyone mentions how redundant this is, consider this: [dark skinned female] has already been accepted and there's another proposal for [dark skinned male]. [glasses] is similarly being split into [male glasses] and [female glasses] The demand for gendered subtags is present, and the precedent has already been set. Yes, there is some redundancy in such a system. However, I think quick searching & seemless site navigation is a larger priority than optimizing computer memory/space. Anyways describe crossdressing +225 create tag crossdressing female +35 (mine) create tag crossdressing male +26 [crossdressing]'s current definition is wrong, it should be an umbrella term for any character dressing in the opposite gender's clothing. across these links, 12 users agree with this sentiment, and only 2 passionately dissent