create 155d ago
tag female raping female
Tag description Non-consensual sex between females.
note rape and reverse rape only describe male-on-female and female-on-male rapes. Shouldn't we also have female-on-female and male-on-male rape tags to complete the pattern?

Post a comment

or to post a comment.

8 Comments

fuckriri1234
fuckriri1234
@yenotguilty "rape" doesnt mean male-on-female rape tho (as you say in your note). it's a general umbrella term for non-consent Logically, "reverse rape" would constitute consent, but that's obviously ridiculous. That being the case, I think we should discard [reverse rape] altogether, and opt for the tags I said below in paragraph 2 I elaborate even further in the provided links
fuckriri1234
fuckriri1234
btw @Osamu09 the issue with ff, mm, mf, and fm is that it's not clear who the perpetrator and victims are. That's why I'm more favorable to this convention or [male-on-male rape] Also, we should have [male raping female] / [male-on-female rape] and [female raping male] / [female-on-male rape] tags. Using "rape" and "reverse rape" doesnt make much sense create tag female rapist +5 merge reverse rape rape -19
yenotguilty
yenotguilty
I totally agree smmgh. It seems a solution may be to add gender and direction to tags. Some sites do things like male:anal, female:anal. Although I feel it has to go further for a more complete capture. For your situation, I think gender, direction, and act has to be expressed. e.g. shota solo anal, shota-on-shota anal, shota-on-loli anal, loli-on-shota anal, shota-on-male anal, male-on-shota anal, shota-on-female anal, female-on-shota anal. The problem is the number of tags proliferate but I don't see another good way to specify exactly what we are looking for.
smmgh
smmgh
I have the same problem when I want shota doing anal since it brings up works containing both but not in one scene so should we have all double tag combinations in the tag directory? I feel like this should be handled differently like let the peaple suggest tag combinations for works and then search for mutual exclusive works between tags or something that would be handy and solve this but it's a pain to develop and probably low proiority
yenotguilty
yenotguilty
I have mixed emotions about shorthand notations. ff rape is hard to understand without knowing how the taxonomy works while female raping female is immediately recognizable without any additional explanation. How about you launch the competing tag idea (ff rape) and we let the public voters decide which one they like better? If voters say "ff rape" is more useful, I will happily concede.
Osamu09
Osamu09
I agree, I guess my only suggestion would be to call it "ff rape" (female-female rape). Not only it's shorter but if you search for "rape" you still get those without even needing to add both "rape" and "ff rape" to the same doujinshi (unless they have both male to female and female to female rape)
yenotguilty
yenotguilty
Why not search for tag:"rape" + tag:"yuri" or tag:"rape" + tag:"females only" instead? The problem is, rape+yuri turns up works that have male raping female while the same female has consensual lesbian sex with another female. rape+"females only" excludes work that have male characters but have female raping another female. Having a dedicated tag makes the search more explicit for the specific content.