Post a comment

Comments are closed on this suggestion.

71 Comments

Osamu09
Osamu09
I changed idea after all. Just looking at how the "group" tag is used, it makes much more sense to create a new orgy tag. If anything the "group" tag is not needed since it's just a work that has neither "sole male" nor "sole female"
mrotongjr
mrotongjr
Maybe for cahnging the group tag
Pornupine
Pornupine
To distinguish from the more general "group" tag the definition for orgy should include a minimum number of participants or groups of participants (I'd think at least 5 or more participants or 3 groups ). Does the sex at an orgy need to be consensual or should "gang rape" qualify? Perhaps being decentralized is an intrinsic part of an orgy?
tanstaafl
tanstaafl
I think both group and orgy would be useful: group for several people having sex with each other, orgy for several people having sex in the same area but not as part of the same group. For example: a couple on one bed, a threesome on another bed, a foursome on the rug.
Octrice's Stocking
Octrice's Stocking
because harem tag have their definitions to help it have a tag (what i mean by this are the amount of characters engaging in sex and gender ratio), why orgy can't also have a tag?using characters quantity in this case. personally i'm annoyed seeing orgy works being dilluted in group tag, together with threesome and harem which have their own tag
Daoist Morningwood
Daoist Morningwood
there is 'Group' already
Aelter
Aelter
Downvoted in favour of 'group'. Though I wish we had 'orgy' instead, but alas, nothing to do about that.
EnEm
EnEm
I agree group covers this. Adding more tags makes it difficult to maintain accuracy.
GoingBlind
GoingBlind
I think "group" covers enough ground whereas making harem and orgy subsets of group will increasingly split hairs. As few categories as feasible would probably be better for the site.
SludgeFudge
SludgeFudge
Orgy: A non-centralized group of people engaging in sexual relations without restriction.
King_of_D
King_of_D
If group is already a category then why bother?
jjmcm
jjmcm
Maybe an orgy is multiple groups having sex around each other. Like 3 groups of 2 people are having sex but just around other people. Then the group tag is just several people having sex together like a foursome or something.
h2016
h2016
If group is a general tag then we should reduce it purpose. As orgy means a lustful act of a party. It is totally different from harem + group. Honestly, I don't like the group tag, it potentially overlaps other tags.
Lythos
Lythos
group sex covers both orgy and harem group is the general tag while orgy and harem are specific ones
Thanos69420
Thanos69420
Maybe orgy should be used when it involves group sex that is kept secret or hidden, insidious-like in nature. Wiki says orgy involves secret initiations or whatnot.
Dunkedup
Dunkedup
I think this designation should be specific to multiple pairings (or more in some cases), compared to say gangbang, which has a a singular focus of the group. Just having it be covered by group is a bit too generalized.
Aelter
Aelter
To avoid similarity to 'group', maybe name this one 'orgy scene'?
Raoqqoar
Raoqqoar
I agree with Rafugapu in that "group" is basically an umbrella term that can describe various scenarios that already have their own dedicated tag. The existence of an umbrella tag should not prevent more explicit sub tags from also existing. (Also agree in that the description of the tag probably needs to be more explicit.)
Rafugapu
Rafugapu
orgy is pretty popular subtag of "group". Because group mostly starts from 3 persons or 2 partners at maximum. Propably needs to clarify that orgy starts from 8 person who engage in sex. Also group is overlap with bunch of other tags like, ffm, fffm, fmm, harem etc, so it's pretty natural to add tag orgy as another subtag
ookami77
ookami77
yeah adding orgy just making "group" tag overlap, except if group or orgy have different meaning?
anderson,alex
anderson,alex
I think 'Group' already fulfills this
12
12