Back to suggestions
create edited 15d ago
tag bad image quality
Tag description A work, whose image quality is noticable bad. This tag is meant for works, whose resolution is bad, the images are blurry or similar problems.It is NOT meant for works with bad artstyle or colouring.

Examples(5)

Edit history

  1. Habanga 15d ago
    Description
    -A work, whose image quality is noticable bad. This tag is meant for works, whose resolution is bad, the images are blurry or similar problems. It is NOT meant for works with bad artstyle or colouring.
    +A work, whose image quality is noticable bad. This tag is meant for works, whose resolution is bad, the images are blurry or similar problems.It is NOT meant for works with bad artstyle or colouring.

Post a comment

or to post a comment.

7 Comments

Habanga
Habanga
I didn't see that. Thanks for the info
fuckriri1234
fuckriri1234
btw there's also this proposal already create tag low quality scan +6
Habanga
Habanga
I agree that some people would misuse the tag, but I think it would be a nice help for many as well. Similarly to the tag "rough translation". "Blurry image quality" could fit as a name, but my idea is, that it would also encompasses if some part of the image is missing or it has some artefacts.
fuckriri1234
fuckriri1234
please give examples. i've seen galleries with BAD QUALITY plastered across it that would likely suit this tag, but i fear the way this tag would be used to push personal preferences on what "bad" quality constitutes some trolls might try to attach bad quality to this but im sure even you would agree it just isnt a better name might be blurry quality or some shit
Habanga
Habanga
I don't know if renaming it to "terrible image quality" would make it less subjective, especially since I think my proposed name is already non subjective.
thomaswalker
thomaswalker
I would agree with this if the tag is renamed to "terrible image quality". Then it's no longer subjective. It becomes a proper distinctor.
fuckriri1234
fuckriri1234
too subjective