@Aelter the current [lolicon] tag is being used as you described [loli]. @azertyitachi is bona fide cope, only @ranchdong has a good reason for rejecting this proposal. I explain it more here: rename lolicon → loli +11

Azertyitachi is correct. "lolicon" = the hentai genre as a whole "loli" = not a sexual term, just a character appearance archetype (examples: Nae Tennouji, Kanna Kamui, Tatsumaki, Shinobu Maehara, Mei Chang)

"lolicon" describes the genre of the story (as in, help the reader find what he is interested in, and avoid what he doesn't like). Not the type of characters the story feature (same as shonen, shojo, seinen, etc...). Some non-lolicon stories could feature a loli. So a lolicon reader would waste his time reader the story, and a person who likes adult women would skip because it features a loli, even if the story revolves around adult characters, and the loli is maybe a sister or goddess that's never sexualized. Making a term be broader than they are is a bad idea.

It makes way more sense to tag "Loli" than Lolicon.

I see where you're coming from but as @Osamu09 says the harm from swapping such an established tag would be rough to say the least.

to be fair I agree with it, but it's also such an estabilished tag that I don't know if we should even bother, the actual use wouldn't change

if I understand what you're trying to say, where lolicon is a person who is attracted to loli, then there's lesbian sex that definitely includes lolicons, as well as straight sex that doesn't