tag bladder penetration
Tag description It refers to sex with penetration of the bladder through the urethra
note We have a tag "urethra insertion", but it doesn't specifically describe whats going on here
7 Comments
SorryMyUgly
No, from the point of view of the process itself, the "stomach deformation" tag must essentially be present, but nothing prevents the artist from simply not drawing it, and again, this does not sufficiently distinguish what is implied by the tag, because "stomach deformation" can be caused by a bunch of other actions
Osamu09
in this case I believe that "bladder penetration"/intercourse, should always have a "stomach deformation" tag, so from 5k works we go down to 700. I get it would be easier if those works were already tagged, but the thing is that we would need to tag them anyway. It's much more efficient to correctly use the tags we already have
Osamu09
@SorryMyUgly having specific tags isn't bad. But there should be a limit and here's why. Let's consider a tag with 500 works like "tights". You could separate "black tights" from "white tights", and let's assume that they're split 50/50. It might seem like it makes sense to separate them for easier search. But with only 500 works (which includes all languages and no other tags) it's not so hard to check all works once you specify the language and maybe add or exclude another tag
SorryMyUgly
Also one of the biggest problem is the separation of the sexes. In the case of the female urethra, it is much easier to reach the bladder and there are more such works. I dont think ive ever seen a version of the proposed tag with a penis
SorryMyUgly
Besides, the tag is quite niche and won't be used often, but it will help to separate those few titles, but at the same time it won't interfere with the overall picture of tags. Anyway, i generally dont understand why having many tags for something specific is bad, because this is the peculiarity of this resource, no matter how strange or terrible the fetish or the thing described is, it will be present in its own separate tag for easy searching or removal from the selection
SorryMyUgly
@Osamu09 Well, the difference is quite big lol. Its like watching solo content in regular porn and content that specifically features intercourse between people. Perhaps the differences for anal sex arent that big, but in the case of the tag i suggested, the difference is even greater due to the fact that, at a minimum, the sizes are different. Urethral toys are usually small, clearly smaller than a regular penis, and its impossible to distinguish between regular "sex toys," or large insertions arent always present, since in the context of regular sex, they're not large insertions. In this case i dont see any clear signs by which i could effectively distinguish the simple use of toys, objects, etc., from full-fledged sex. No matter how strange my reasoning may be, however, yes, one of the reasons is size, and the second is obviously the interaction of two people, there are others, but is it worth describing them?
Osamu09
am I the only one who thinks it shouldn't matter whether it's a penis or not? Like what's the difference? Is it because in intercourse both people are feeling good at the same time? I just don't see the need for it. But then again I'm the one who suggested merge anal intercourse → anal withdrawn, so what do I know