Great examples and I can see the point, honestly for me I just see it as the same thing BUT if we are going to be specific I guess it is two different thing in tags wisely. I get it and yeah I guess it is different
Seems like people sees it different to actual flat breast to small breast, hmmm I can't seem to comprehend it as I see it as the same thing but maybe an example would be nice to have
Small or flat is the same because both correlates that they have small breast. You might be thinking of medium size as small and flat as.. well flat. Both are small and flat.
I might start to revoke suggestions that are not in an acceptable state and not being maintained / edited by the owner as a policy going forward. I hesitate only because it makes things harder to communicate for y'all but keeps taxonomy moving and less stagnant as a whole.
@Aelter mb i must've misread it. I really like the order you proposed (stored in [1/3]). my only issue is that @Osamu09 who proposed "tiny chest" seems to define it as anything less than small (flat and "perky" both; if I'm wrong my bad)..
i also think it's a little weird how the breast sizes all take the form [x breasts] like small breasts, large breasts, etc. and then we just have [flat chest] lol
btw my old account got restricted (didn't even know was possible) cus i was copy/pasting this series' order across galleries
#378090|5 no 2 no Koibana. Ch.1-2|11,897
@Fuckriri: My own suggestion was actually ”Breast size. Each breast range from just above flat, up to a palmful.”
meaning all breasts where the size is ANYWHERE between pettanko to palmful. So your example would fit well there. Per your comment ”Not entirely a palmful, but not flat either.”
@Osamu: I’ve had sex with at least two women with flat chests. I think it helps to remember that ’flat’ is what we perceive with our eyes (and IRL our hands). It doesn’t mean that there’s just a ribcage under the skin.
About the ’gigantic breast’ thing: I can see a lot of people having your view. If I am in the minority I’ll not be stubborn. I am perhaps older than most people here, and therefor more influenced by older terminology (i.e. ’bakunyuu’) than others.
(Your example I would classify as ’gigantic breasts’.)
Sidenote, @Fuckriri, where did you come from dog?? Registered a couple weeks ago and instantly started commenting on everything?! Not that I mind, I like your discussion!
@Osamu09 flat chest isn't really saying that no tit fat exists, just that it's in such a small amount that the chest itself appears flat
and tbh is it relevant to bring that up in a hentai site? i dont think anyone that sees "flat chest" is going to think, "ackshuallyyy, that's not realistic because all tits have fat, so it is impossible to have a flat chest"
I get that there's a middle ground between flat and small (I refer to as "perky"), but defining that middle ground in an objective manner is pretty difficult.
And calling it "tiny breasts" wouldn't be the best idea either because, as you said, tiny seems to include flat chest. no need to double up
@Aelter I was actually under the impression that "gigantic breasts" would fall under "hyper". It does seem like some people think of "gigantic breasts" as just a larger size of "huge breasts", like for example #650552|Maki-chan VS Kurokawa-kun Kasshoku Baku…|31,126, it only had "huge breasts" when it was uploaded but they added the "gigantic breasts". But to me it would seem pointless to make such a distinction
@fuckriri1234 my "tiny breasts" tag is actually supposed to be "flat chest", I just chose a different name, but that also means I left some margin of errors. Which makes sense because as I explained on the other suggestions, there's no such a thing as being flat, every female has breast tissue/fat, it's just the amount that varies and depending on other factors such as breasts shape they can be more or less noticeable
@Aelter I agree with your system from [3] except there may be a nirvana right between flat and small. Something like the thumbnail on #354384|Mesukko Okami Wakarase Shuzai Kiroku|55,670
Not entirely a palmful, but not flat either. Tbh do we need it? probably not, it just convolutes the tag pool and makes tagging harder for those not in the know. But yeah felt like pointing it out. Completely fine with small = anything larger than flat
left more thoughts here
createtagperky breasts-2
[2/3]
I also think we'd be better off adapting Danbooru's size system, rather than eHentai's.
DANBOORU
flat chest — A female character with a completely flat chest, that is, no breasts whatsoever
small breasts (b.) — About a palmful in size. In real-world sizes, this can run from just over AA cup to just under C cup
medium b. — Each breast is larger than a palmful, but smaller than the character's face
large b. — Around/more than the same volume as a sphere with the same diameter as the character's face, but smaller than their head
huge b. — As large as/larger than the character's head but less than twice the size of their head
gigantic b. — More than twice the size of the head
EHENTAI
small b. — Must be small enough to reasonably call the girl "flat"
big b. — Generally large breasts
huge b. — Abnormally large breasts. Must be at least double the size of the owner's head
gigantic b. — Impossibly large breasts. Must be equal to or greater in size than the rest of the person's body
[3/3]
If you want to know about Japanese terms like 'pettanko' and 'bakunyuu' (what most sites used way back), check out japanesewithanime.com and their "Breast Sizes" article.
Finally, my own suggestions:
flat chest — Breast size. A female character has a completely flat chest. Aka. 'flat-chested', 'pettanko', 'washboard chest'
small breasts — Breast size. Each breast range from just above flat, up to a palmful.
medium breasts — Breast size. Each breast range from a palmful to the owner's face diameter.
big breasts — Breast size. Each breast sits within the diameter of the owner's face to their head.
huge breasts — Breast size. Each breast is larger than the owner's head but still look realistically plausible.
gigantic breasts — Breast size. Too large to be seen on a real life woman (disregarding 'macromastia') but still believable on a manga character.
hyper breasts — Breast size. Ridiculously big. Can be as voluminous as a full-grown woman, or as a house, or even larger.
Yeah I agree with the one below me.
Since flat is obviously flat like those memes where they say they're a chopping board. So in that case "tiny breast" Should be in the flat is justice.
Because even with small breast you could technically still squeeze them with the hands. The one example, I could think of that has small breast but is usually joked about "Being flat" (I could be wrong/misremembering this so you can correct me if I'm wrong.) Is Kaguya Shinomiya from Love is War.
She has small breast but you can literally see it being squeezed by Miyuki Shirogane. Even if it's not a full on squeeze, as long as you can almost squeeze it, I think it's not flat is justice but just being small.
@ranchdong
Female character with a below average size of breasts. They should be at least small enough that an average man's hands can fit them entirely. But they shouldn't be so small that their shape and curve is barely noticeable even when naked, for those cases use the "tiny breasts" tag
Sadly, not enough here guys. We need some level of detail or substance and not just the meme. and I'm not opposed to accepting tiny and flat as well but we need to establish some level of guidelines currently the proposed landscape looks like this: big breasts, small breasts, tiny breasts, flat chest. I feel like if we can equate these to consistent rules and maybe add medium? we might be onto something.
since many people seem to have missed it, createtagtiny breasts+29
let's be real, "small breasts" is very often used for breasts that are not flat at all
"Flat is justice" is funny, although I think as a definition it's a bit thin.
This tag in particular is tricky. It's probably worth having a bigger discussion, but that's hard to do in just the comment section.
Some things worth considering: Is "flat" the minimum or below the threshold for the "small breasts" tag"? If flat is the minimum then what should be the upper limit?
If part of the intention behind the tag is to help distinguish small breasts from loli content, then the definition needs to explicitly state their exclusion.
Honestly, with hentai, I'd use this tag with any works containing women of normal/average proportions, and not the giant watermellon-titted bimbos that are the norm. I would even suggest we have a separate "Flat" tag as well.
Keep small breasts, it's important that it is seperate from lolicon. Lolicon refers to characters that are underage while small breasts is just a body type that is honestly common amongst adult women, especially asian
I don't think we need to put small breasts with lolicon tag. Some people don't wanna see lolis when searching for small breasts, but I'm seeing a lot of people upvoting this on loli hentai. Maybe write something about this on the tag description?
In my opinion, small breasts should be for small but present breasts, not outright flat chests. It's used that way a lot at present, and I believe a distinction should be made.
yes as for size limit i believe if the nipple raises above where her breast starts by more than 1.7006 inches then it cannot be considered small breasts. someone get me a ruler!