Describe: females only

describe 102d ago

Tag description

Proposed

Yuri, now with 100% fewer men!

Applied

The sexual content of the story ONLY involves female characters, if the sexual content involves males, futanari, or dickgirls do not use this tag.

staff Went with this

ranchdong

15 Comments

How are futanari and dickgirls not girls? Shouldnt the tag be called 'no dicks' or 'no penises' then?

ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ

@Kira yimino In that case you could use a combination of "Yuri" + "Females Only". The "females only" tag doesn't mean there will be Yuri (Since it could be a million things that aren't yuri) and the "Yuri" tag doesn't mean it will be Females Only. The description for this tag should reflect that the only characters that appear are females, not that there's yuri involved. Reciprocally; Yuri's tag description should reflect that there will be sex between females (And only females) at some point in the story; however it's not necessarily absent of men.

In my opinion Yuri tag is trap it's say Yuri because there's two female having kissing or sex suddenly men show up and then they having sex like bro remove the Yuri and replace like threesome there's no point having Yuri if there's a man I read doujin lesbian only hentai but suddenly it's a trap

Yuri, now with 100% fewer men!

I'm all down to having fun but that's a horrible description, lol "Females only" does not AT ALL mean yuri.

What's the point on discussing and voting on a description if there's only one description to choose from?

That's cool and all, but it's still vague and is gonna cause a lot of mistagging. Especially with people who are new to the genre.

This description is intentionally worded the way that it is because of all of the "gray areas" surrounding body-swap [cf: #603879 | Onna no mizo shiru | Only a woman knows | 3,212 , #484660 | Watashi wa Mirusen nano! | 2,945 , and #296474 | Tanin ni Naru Kusuri 3 | Medicine to Be… | 6,933 ] or futanari/transfem/penis-growth [cf: #601536 | Amrita | 2,287 , #444653 | Surprise & Seduce | 4,872 , and #409026 | Ouou | 4,472 ] content, as both have been tagged this way in the past, and generally speaking, the main bone of contention amongst yuri fans is the tendency for characters who are clearly men with masculine features to be crowbarred into works which have no need for them - "females only" has traditionally been seen as the "true yuri" tag by the communuity as a result, and this phrasing is the best way to keep that spirit alive.

I like Muschi's description.

Objectively speaking, they can all still be in the story, but to warrant the tag, the story would only have lesbian sex in it. Yuri with tentacles is still valid since it could be a female who has them or is using them. They could be a monster girl, an alien girl, or a plant girl.

Does possession yuri count as females only if the soul is male? I think not. What about gender bender, futanari, yuri with tentacles? Nope too, etc.

Way too vauge, how about something like "The sexual content of the story ONLY involves female characters, if the sexual content involves males, futanari, and dickgirls do not use this tag."

This doesn't describe anything. It should include something like, "Only female characters (not futanari) take part in sexual activities," so that people don't misapply it.

Who the fuck wants dudes in their lesbian comics?

Post a comment

15 Comments