Tag description Furry is commonly a creature with human-like intelligence or sapience, Like the Beauty and the Beast or Zootopia. OwO
note Alright I fix it again, ask me again if it's still need fixing.
Edit history
-
Alright there's a bit of confusion but honestly it's difficult to put a description for a wide variety of furries, but I put some examples there so yeah. I'm sorry if I'm bad at wording here since my English is still improving.
Description-Furry is commonly a creatures with humanlike behavior and stood straight, more animals then humans. Like the Beauty and the Beast. OwO+Furry is commonly a creature with human-like intelligence or sapience, Like the Beauty and the Beast or Zootopia. OwONote-Just doing it I guess?+Alright I fix it again, ask me again if it's still need fixing. -
Seeing some points in the comments, hope this help or need more changing it?
Description-Furry is a creatures with humanoid features, it's contain a wide variety of all different animals types. Whether real or fictional species.+Furry is commonly a creatures with humanlike behavior and stood straight, more animals then humans. Like the Beauty and the Beast. OwO
7 Comments
fuckriri1234
create tag juujin withdrawn
preach @Gataunamanya_apa. the proposal above has a pretty concise description imo: "anthropomorphic animals with human-like attributes"
I removed a lot of its description for brevity, do you think there's anything else necessary to add?
Gataunamanya_apa
(2/2)
4. “More animals than humans” is also confusing. I assume you mean that the creature should still be primarily animal-like while having human characteristics, but that's not what the phrase actually tells us. It's also difficult to decide where the line between “more animal” and “more human” would be. It would be clearer to simply explain what animal and human characteristics you're looking for.
Gataunamanya_apa
I have quite a lot of issues with your description.
(1/2)
1. There are quite a few typos and words that are used incorrectly. For example, “a creatures” should be “a creature,” “stood straight” should be something like “standing upright,” and “then” should be “than.”
2. The definition is too vague. Saying that a furry is a creature with “humanlike behavior” doesn't establish what actually counts as humanlike. Does the creature need to speak? Have human-level intelligence? Use tools? Wear clothes? Show human emotions? The definition doesn't give us any criteria, so it's difficult to determine what would and wouldn't qualify.
3. “Stood straight” is also an unnecessary restriction. Standing upright can be a characteristic of an anthropomorphic animal, but it isn't required. A character could remain quadrupedal while still having human-like intelligence, speech, emotions, or behavior.
FallingStarX
Alright I fixed it, tell me if it's right or not.
Pornupine
I don't know if it was intended but I think this description would make "furry" the umbrella term for most humanoid creatures, instead of the midpoint on a scale between human and animal. Also, based on this definition Kemonomimi (humanoid characters that possess animal-like features. The characters will be predominately human and any real animal characteristics are minimal i.e., generally kemonomimi characters have ears and a tail which are animal-like.) would be a type of furry, which would mean excluding furry [-furry] in the search would also exclude kemonomimi. This would make it harder for users to find kemonomimi content.
FallingStarX
Technically I guess?
grinningman
Could technically help with the Splatoon series. Any specific differences between types of furries could just go to e6